two sizes, to scale · strictly 18+
Goldilocks Browse Medium Splitter 2.0 vs Mdl Splitter 2.0

Medium vs Mdl Splitter 2.0

Two rungs of the same ladder: SquarePeg’s Splitter 2.0 in Medium and Mdl — drawn on top of each other to scale, so the step between them is something you can see rather than subtract.

Medium Splitter 2.0 by SquarePeg
Medium Splitter 2.0 SquarePeg
girth10.7″ usable ≈4.6″ feelsoft
$129
Mdl Splitter 2.0 by SquarePeg
Mdl Splitter 2.0 SquarePeg
girth12.0″ usable ≈4.8″ feelsoft
$149

One on top of the other

Both outlines on one axis, at the same scale. Sizes come from the makers’ published girths; where a usable cut-out exists, the profile itself is traced from it. Where they overlap they’re the same; the gap is the difference.
0″1″2″3″4″

Side by side at the same scale

Drawn to scale: sizes from published girths, and the profile traced from the cut-out where we have one. Point positions along the shaft are approximate.
0″1″2″3″4″10.7″8.0″12.0″9.3″Medium Splitter 2.0≈4.6″ usableMdl Splitter 2.0≈4.8″ usable

How the numbers compare

Differences of about ¼ inch or more are highlighted. Blanks mean the maker doesn’t publish that point.
Medium Splitter 2.0Mdl Splitter 2.0
Total length 5.6″5.8″
Widest girth 10.7″12.0″
Narrowest girth 8.0″9.3″
Firmness options soft soft
Knot no no

Which one should you get?

Every line generated from the spec deltas above.

The other sizes of this sculpt

Same sculpt, the other steps in its size ladder — each one measured the same way.

Build your own comparison — any two to four toys →